« Modesty and church dress | Main | Who will pay for this? »
Wednesday
Jul162014

Ed Stetzer opinion in the ABN

So Ed Stetzer, on the basis of his argument about the Hobby Lobby case, would allow a company owned by Jehovah Witnesses to not insure for blood transfusions for their employees? (Baptist Press link). Would companies owned by Scientologists not have to cover psychiatric services for their employees? Would companies owned by Christian scientists not have to cover medical doctors for their employees, only Christian science practioners? Also, does this company cover ED treatments for men while objecting to reproductive coverage for women? Why cover any sexually related treatments? I think the ACA is right in setting out what fair minimum coverages should be for all employees, period. The female workers in any company in which they work deserve the right to coverage for reproductive medicines and treatments determined by the woman and her physician.  

Ronald Ford
Simpsonville, Ky.